• ^ The 5 sandwich-sort of fillers was basically: crossbreed contract nouns having a good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbors,” where komsija is also produce M otherwise F agreement), such as (15b); hybrid arrangement nouns which have an excellent possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” in which cerekalo normally cause M otherwise N agreement), like in (15c); NSg animate nouns that have an enthusiastic ordinal count [prvo prase “(the) basic pig,” in which prase has a crossbreed plural setting, triggering FSg or NPl agreement], as with (15d); normal contract nouns that have a beneficial MSg nominal complement [uspeh dekana “(the) profits (of your) dean,” where the genitive match are homonymous into the paucal, in addition to paucal lets paucal and MPl arrangement], like in (15e); normal contract MSg nouns which have a PP match (prijatelj iz skole “the newest buddy out-of college,” in which interest consequences would be questioned), as in (15f).
• ^ The fresh salience of your instances was managed regarding the following the way. Very first, you to publisher invented the instances predicated on their intuition, and other analyzed her or him; in which disagreement emerged, advice have been replaced and also the processes is repeated towards the freshly produced examples.
• ^ The necessity of the essential difference between contract habits for the status was orthogonal towards the hypotheses regarding the appeal of your papers, as they just generate forecasts towards cousin quantities amongst the standards, or amongst the requirements plus the ft-line ratios. I statement this type of screening for the sake of completeness of the statement, since the informed of the editors of the regularity.
• ^ We have designed and you will given a special try like this, so we are presently looking at the knowledge.

Records

Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, I. (2016a). “Aftereffect of animacy and you will agentivity towards running from agreement during the Serbo-Croatian,” in Education from inside the Dialects and you may Brain, Chose records out-of 3rd Novi Unfortunate Workshop to the Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and Health-related Linguistic Lookup, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Professors out-of Beliefs), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, I. (2016b). On the for the dependence out of gender with respect to amount for the contract which have matched victims: an experimental study. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, agreement and dealing recollections recovery from inside the phrase manufacturing: facts out-of gender and you may circumstances into the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Hairdresser, H., and you may Carreiras, Meters. (2005). Grammatical gender and you can amount arrangement inside the Language: An ERP evaluation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt, R., and Walkow, M kissbrides.com stay at website. (2013). Locating agreement when you look at the sentence structure: a quarrel out-of contract for the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Principle 29, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom you srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Mixed-Consequences Activities Having fun with S4 Groups

Carminati, Yards. (2005). Processing reflexes of your feature ladder (people > amount > gender) and you will effects to own linguistic idea. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation of the Stage,” when you look at the Ken Hale. An existence within the Vocabulary, ed. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Press), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Agreement asymmetries when you look at the accentuate structures,” from inside the Certified Answers to Slavic linguistics: The fresh new Ottawa Appointment 2003, eds A great. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you can D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Products), 91–108.

De- Vincenzi, M. (1999). Differences between this new morphology of gender and you can count: research away from setting up coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 537–553.

De Vincenzi, M., and you may Di Domenico, Elizabeth. (1999). A distinction certainly ?-features: the brand new character away from intercourse and count regarding retrieval away from pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.

Doron, Elizabeth. (2000). “VSO and you will remaining-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew compared to. modern Hebrew,” about Syntax of one’s Verb 1st Languages, eds Good. Carnie and you will Age. Guilfoyle (Nyc, NY: Oxford School Drive), 75–96.